In light of this: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/20/public-editor/trump-russia-fbi-liz-spayd-public-editor.html … incredibly difficult to see how NYT can justify its presentation here: https://nyti.ms/2jDhXWO
-
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
It seems clear the story was "there is a serious and ongoing investigation" thrust of article reads "nothing to see here folks."
2 replies 5 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Oh. Let me just say, for the record, that I think that Oct report will, ON THE FACTS, hold up better than today.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey
Which is not to say other allegations not treated there or anywhere don't have merit. Just that those are...a distraction.
6:54 PM - 20 Jan 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.