In light of this: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/20/public-editor/trump-russia-fbi-liz-spayd-public-editor.html … incredibly difficult to see how NYT can justify its presentation here: https://nyti.ms/2jDhXWO
Really? What if thte evidence doesn't exist and/or they're looking in the wrong places or @nytimes @Susan_Hennessey
-
-
they warned
@nytimes for reasons that are still more embarrassing?@Susan_Hennessey -
This part of the argument is about what FBI/Comey released to public *prior* to the election,
@emptywheel.@nytimes@Susan_Hennessey -
The highlighted part? Says no indication Trump target, consistent w/yesterday's story. Also
@nytimes@Susan_Hennessey -
That not clear tied to election. Again, consistent w/yesterday's story.
@Susan_Hennessey -
You'll note that *both* times Comey *announced* investigations related to Hillary, FBI came up goose eggs,
@emptywheel.@Susan_Hennessey -
And? I'm one of the earliest Comey skeptics, trust me I am not defending him.
@Susan_Hennessey -
I get that,
@emptywheel. I don't know if@Susan_Hennessey smells same rat I do but it appears@nytimes is not pressing FBI hard enough here. -
Or perhaps it's the exact opposite and FBI saved NYT from a really big embarrassment.
@Susan_Hennessey@nytimes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.