Looking close to unanimous here too.
-
-
Feels like since outcome is a foregone conclusion, it's a measure of what kind of points they think they need.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Him I can't figure out. I'm just saying McCaskill needs Trump points, Booker needs anti-Trump points. Gillibrand too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
can you explain the Sanders vote?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No's were: Udall, Warren, Blumenthal, Booker, Heinrich, Wyden, Van Hollen, Gillibrand, Cortez Masto, Merkley, Booker.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.