Then what algorithms are you referring to?
-
-
Replying to @sponson
Take a step back: What distinguishes what this guy did from what James O'Keefe has done, to much greater effect, for years?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
O’Keefe paid by big GOP donors; “news” forger paid by Google?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
O’Keefe’s stunts are all over the MSM or once were; NYT “forger” used FB to promote his fabrications-spread like wildfire
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sponson @emptywheel
Sponson Retweeted Sponson
Here’s my previous answer to your ? about O’Keefehttps://twitter.com/sponson/status/821801225817640965 …
Sponson added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
btw if you are asking which one worries me more personally more, Dude, absent the FB propagation engine, is nearly harmless
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sponson
Right. That's my point. Crappy Fox news is way more damaging, even still, than Dude. And OKeefe is more damaging thus far.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
Had I read blog 1st, I might never have asked ?, so sorry for the confusion. Trump’s insidious use of term will probably kill it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Which, no offense, is why I linked it close to the beginning of the discussion.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Correct. How to succinctly counter people using term “fake news” about fabrications is my own particular problem to deal with
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.