But I did decide that this doc would make a great assignment in a college How to Read class.
Usu in favor of publishing docs. But think public (& many reporters') critical thinking skills don't do well w/it
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this document should have been released months ago
-
It was a Hillary doc. Why didn't she?
@josephfcox@rj_gallagher -
it was originally commissioned by Republicians, and yes Clinton and Republicans should have leaked
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree it shouldn't be just published like this bc inflammatory. BUT I think folks are wrong when
-
they say this is not the same as wikileaks. WL Podesta email leaks authenticated the emails, not the
-
contents of emails. Thought experiment: what if Podesta emailed dossier to another staffer? Then that
-
email was hacked & leaked by WL. It is an authentic Podesta email. The content not verified as all
-
Podesta emails not verified. For example, say Podesta emails a controversial person "thanks for bribes
-
you gave me." WL published emails lien that without verifying if there was a bribe. So news orgs
-
talking about content of dossier on as unverified grounds as reporting on contents about Podesta email
-
CNN tack on dossier of it exist we can't talk about content would've been reporting WL Podesta emails
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.