I think this was a moment to lean forward in a big way on public disclosure...But the countervailing argument is compelling as well.https://twitter.com/andrewsweiss/status/817519141359939584 …
-
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Basically there were three options: 1. Disclose it all, burn possibly critical future sources. 2. Top line conclusions. 3. A middle ground.
3 replies 17 retweets 34 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
The "put it all out there" option was never going to happen both for genuine security reasons and because of a deeply entrenched culture.
5 replies 16 retweets 41 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
The middle ground seems like the reasonable option. Until you ask what those disclosures would actually accomplish v. the risks.
2 replies 13 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Maybe 1) timing dictated this as well as 2) your $64K, poss of US persons involved.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Yes, clearly timing prevented NIE route. And of course USP info wouldn't be shared. But as is it's almost counterproductive.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think the JAR was far more counterproductive (unless my theory abt it traffic shaping into certain Tor nodes is right).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.