On the spat between DNC and FBI over the former's server https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/01/06/on-the-dnc-server-fight/ …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
I'm of the opinion that the gov attribution case is based on downstream sources (C2 servers, etc) more than industry forensics.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_HectorTorres @emptywheel
But given nature of the case and players involved, it is a :glaring: oversight to never get access to servers. Mind boggling.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_HectorTorres
Some day the FBI will start leaking like a sieve on this and I expect we'll learn some interesting details abt DNC.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Yeah. This is not the behavior of an organization (DNC) that wants to get to the bottom of their issue. Which I don't understand
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_HectorTorres
When leaks started I heard DNC may have worried abt funding details being released. All political parties break funding laws.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Makes sense. You outlined good reasons in your article why they wouldn't trust the FBI too. And yet, given the stakes...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_HectorTorres
Here's thing: In May and June, no one--not DNC, not FBI, not CS--knew that GRU (not FSB) was going to be leaking docs.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @_HectorTorres
Most of the motivations make sense (well, not DNC's deferral of this) if our adversary is FSB hacking to collect intel.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Makes sense, motivations made sense before July. After first leaks, if I were DNC leadership, I'd be terrified of what came next
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
And they were. And they appear to have done some stupid things in response, which haven't gotten sustained attention.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.