I've always said the Podesta stuff is the most compelling evidence. Tho even there, @pwnallthethings is missing a detail.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @jspoupart
In any case, I think the evidence is strong but people like
@pwnallthethings are missing details they shouldn't.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @pwnallthethings
Such as? I think
@JayAckroyd should have both of you on VS to talk about this. Compelling stuff. Merci!1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @jspoupart
We know someone clicked that link. But we IT guy actually provided correct link.
@pwnallthethings@JayAckroyd1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @jspoupart
I also find it remarkable that IC seemed to have no idea the Podesta emails were coming.
@pwnallthethings@JayAckroyd4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
big difference between knowing emails were hacked, and knowing they would be released.
1 reply 1 retweet 29 likes -
Replying to @pwnallthethings
Right. Podesta says they knew neither.
@jspoupart@JayAckroyd3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Then, there's the FBI Agent who couldn't be bothered to drive to the DNC Office to warn them.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @jspoupart
That's a sort of DNC-serving story. He did give tech info he'd need to ID FSB. Tech probably got it
@pwnallthethings@JayAckroyd1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I read somewhere that this Agent kept calling/leaving messages but was ignored by DNC.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Right. The NYT was neither the first story or the most balanced. @pwnallthethings @JayAckroyd
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @pwnallthethings
OK. Well, at any rate, it would be really interesting to hear this at length. What do you say
@JayAckroyd?0 replies 1 retweet 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.