do you believe "traditional journalism" cannot, by definition, publish fake news?
Especially since point is the same: attempt to coopt religion primarily for a member group. @adamjohnsonNYC
-
-
No it isn't. "Fake news" category was originally just totally made up intentionally for clicks.
-
Well, and to serve a political purpose. Just like ... Fox News.
@zeynep@adamjohnsonNYC -
No, the original meaning was for, literally, fake news sites, where only driver was clicks. Not politics
-
If you want to define it as algo-driven misinfo, fine. But don't call it fake news 1/2
@zeynep@adamjohnsonNYC -
Which has centuries long backdrop.
@zeynep@adamjohnsonNYC
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.