I always regret weighing in on Snowden. That said: 1. I'm looking forward to reading Bart's book, which I know to be carefully researched.https://twitter.com/bartongellman/status/815672306169212929 …
-
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
2. It's insane to claim anyone who was involved in the story isn't biased. That includes the journalists, who should be read thusly.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
3. Responses to WSJ story ignore significant other lies, including claims made under oath that ES worked with/handled FISA material.
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
4. I know, personally, that NSA responded to Snowden affair in good faith and with full candor to its oversight bodies.
5 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Except there are things in the HPSCI report that are inconsistent w/actual NSA details. Why?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I don't have any knowledge on how HPSCI reached it's conclusions. For example, I have no idea where GED discrepancy came from.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @emptywheel
HPSCI also clear a lot of its investigation done second handed so as not to prejudice criminal justice side.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AustinMillb_rge
That is the claim, which is ALSO inconsistent with NSA's internal statements.
@Susan_Hennessey2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But that doesn't explain why HPSCI couldn't call State of MD. @Susan_Hennessey
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.