I don't know what you want me to say? Any other words out of 3000 written on New Years you want to gripe w/? Want edit pen?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @empiricalerror
You disagree w/my read. Fine. I observed 1) no mention of Hillary/Trump (you agree) 2) slathering of squish. You cry FOUL!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
I'm not crying foul. I asked a simple question. Still waiting for answer. If you take that as a personal attack, that's on you.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @empiricalerror
Simple A is that what struck me abt series is slathering on of squishy terms. A technique I used to downgrade 18 yos for.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
Fair enough, although -- with all due respect -- it fails to recognize that admin has to walk a very fine line here, imo.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
It doesn't fail to recognize. I've written other posts abt point. It fails to make a judgement about an observation made.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
Sorry, disagree. As far as judgment is concerned, "influence" is as far as O can currently go. /1
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror @emptywheel
And admin never officially went further, if I am not mistaken (CIA leaks are different matter). The rest of the squishy stuff /2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror @emptywheel
is basically the same language that admin has used from the get-go (e.g. October 7 ODNI statement). /3x
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
Can you tell me where squish is here? "These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process."
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.