In other words, you've made my point, that this motive statement is all abt dodging the controversial statements.
-
-
You disagree w/my read. Fine. I observed 1) no mention of Hillary/Trump (you agree) 2) slathering of squish. You cry FOUL!
-
I'm not crying foul. I asked a simple question. Still waiting for answer. If you take that as a personal attack, that's on you.
-
Simple A is that what struck me abt series is slathering on of squishy terms. A technique I used to downgrade 18 yos for.
-
Fair enough, although -- with all due respect -- it fails to recognize that admin has to walk a very fine line here, imo.
-
Meaning, outgoing D pres can't just put out WH statement that could be taken as overt attack on legitimacy of his successor.
-
Here's a post where I DO make a judgment abt Obama's response. You might like that one better. https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/12/18/obamas-response-to-russias-hack-an-emphasis-on-americas-more-generalized-vulnerability/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.