A Deep Dive on the Obama Response to Russian DNC Hack (and Theft and Harassment) https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/01/01/a-deep-dive-on-the-obama-response-to-russian-dnc-hack-and-theft-and-harassment/ …
Obama appears not to have reissued EO. Language on expansion is O statement & fact sheet. Former says we'll sanction for OTHER elections
-
-
FSB included in sanctions even tho they're only known to have done what CIA & NSA do all the time, collect data.
-
DHS/FBI statement says RU "conducted many of the activities generally described by a number of [private] security companies." But not all?
-
JAR states FSB exfiled docs. It says only that GRU "likely" exfiled docs. Does that mean no one saw GRU stealing the docs like they did FSB?
-
Finally, note that JAR makes absolutely no mention of Podesta hack, the one we've got best info on.
-
best info in terms, publicly, of quantity not quality, right?
-
Both. We have the email that allegedly led to the hack.
-
but too many questions around that, particularly as you note it is virtually unmentioned in JAR. And that is one that mattered.
-
Ive always felt we had more on DNC because of CrowdStrike, etc + IC + Guccifer 2
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.