Voxsplainer on hack steers WAY clear of controversial motives behind it. It's abt “Faith, integrity, and confidence” in democracy, not Trump
-
-
-
Obama appears not to have reissued EO. Language on expansion is O statement & fact sheet. Former says we'll sanction for OTHER elections
-
FSB included in sanctions even tho they're only known to have done what CIA & NSA do all the time, collect data.
-
DHS/FBI statement says RU "conducted many of the activities generally described by a number of [private] security companies." But not all?
-
JAR states FSB exfiled docs. It says only that GRU "likely" exfiled docs. Does that mean no one saw GRU stealing the docs like they did FSB?
-
Finally, note that JAR makes absolutely no mention of Podesta hack, the one we've got best info on.
-
best info in terms, publicly, of quantity not quality, right?
-
Both. We have the email that allegedly led to the hack.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
this is missing something (unless I misread): the amended EO defines the electoral system as part of "critical infrastructure."
-
that wasn't true previously; the original EO targeted the profiteers of cybercrime, not necessarily the perpetrators.
-
I'm not sure I understand the distinction you're making.
-
that graf you pulled on tampering with the electoral system is new. It wasn't in the original EO issued in 2015
-
Right. That's what I meant to say--I guess I need to make that clearer.
-
ok glad you got what I meant
-
I added a sentence to explain that this is an extension of an existing EO. Hope that's clearer.
-
looks good to me
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
2nd paragraph typo , "inludes" should be "includes"
-
TY. Apparently the spellchecker is still on holiday.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
quick edit: change word into "chance" - 1st paragraph
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.