If @ErrataRob can debunk Epstein's main points, while ignoring several OTHER problems, how is that knee-jerk?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey
Maybe, just maybe, you need someone more honest than Epstein to make the anti-Snowden case?
@ErrataRob3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
lies make the case. whether someone writes a blog post attacking a messenger or not, lies remain
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey
yeah,
@ErrataRob is attacking messenger for having bias. it's incredibly weak logic, given topic2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daviottenheimer @emptywheel and
given a messenger A lied, let's attack messenger B delivering proof because bias exists in errybdy?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daviottenheimer
Except Messenger B's "proof" is full of "lies." See the problem?
@Susan_Hennessey@ErrataRob1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
that's what i'm saying. didn't establish lies, only bias, in messenger assassination attempt
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daviottenheimer
Or maybe bad research. Still his "truth" is not. That should be fair to note.
@Susan_Hennessey@ErrataRob2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @daviottenheimer
(Tho I've really been planning on ignoring it and waiting for his book.)
@Susan_Hennessey@ErrataRob1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Again, I'm more interested in evidence NSA was not 100% forthcoming to HPSCI. @Susan_Hennessey @ErrataRob
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.