Even if you're inclined to believe Snowden had pure (or mixed) motives, his numerous lies are inescapable. http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fable-of-edward-snowden-1483143143 …
-
-
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
Snowden & apologists will brush this off w/ vague denials and counteraccusations. Burden's on them to square his representations w/ reality.
15 replies 12 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
so I go full apologist for you http://blog.erratasec.com/2016/12/your-absurd-story-doesnt-make-me.html …
3 replies 16 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @ErrataRob
Aw man! You even missed several other problems with Epstein. You're not a very good apologist.
@Susan_Hennessey1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Replying to @emptywheel @ErrataRob
Plus, more interesting than HPSCI's outright errors is evidence NSA not entirely honest w/HPSCI. @Susan_Hennessey
5:33 PM - 31 Dec 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.