Even if you're inclined to believe Snowden had pure (or mixed) motives, his numerous lies are inescapable. http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fable-of-edward-snowden-1483143143 …
-
-
How much of that WSJ story you reckon is true? I'm tearing my hair out over liberal hypocrisy on re: the NSA. /1
-
I might wait for the book and do a review then. But there are claims in there that have been debunked/conflict w/HPSCI.
-
Which ones? Linked to debunking?
-
Just as an example, the HPSCI report doesn't show he took 1.5M. It includes 2 claims, one from DIA, one IC.
-
FOIAed docs make it clear DIA was deliberately written to be most damning.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.