seems like semantics. They hacked a utility computer. Some are reading this as they hacked nothing.
-
-
-
By "they" you mean, malware from a overly-broad report was found on their computer. That they, yes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Even if fake/less than earnest topic should be a concern. A grave one at that. Not spc bcs Rssia but bcs a hack cld wreck havoc
-
Agree our grid should be a concern. Also think crying wolf makes that less likely.
-
Quite. But so much infrastructure open to the intertubes. So little public interest in securing it. True here too & hpy new year
-
Here you go. Read the whole thread.https://twitter.com/welcome_2_1984/status/815286642302971904 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cjcmichel predictable enough that I knew I could immediately mock it w/o fear of looking badhttps://twitter.com/djjohnso/status/815004308039225344 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it seems like a high percentage
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@joanneleon They are a rag mag as far as I'm concerned.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What percent of Hillary supporters still fall for the first version and ignore the corrections?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh I think a few come to mind, hehe.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
all. The real question should be is how bad does Wapo get each story wrong?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.