1. Can we agree the issue is whether or not the candidate is professionally qualified? Arguing whether the candidate
-
-
-
2. meets statuary requirements of nepotism seems to be playing on Trump's terms.
-
are you suggesting goldsmith' judgment, joined by others, that he's totally qualified is wrong?
-
not playing rhetorical games. I don't think he is qualified. He has appeared before Supremes once. Needs more experience.
-
did you raise that concern abt Kagan?
-
I don't need to be ideologically pure. That is for true believers who wish for a world. I want what is acheivable in the world.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
sorry i missed it
-
I tried to sum up by suggesting Trump was picking RFK. I've been told that clearer case of nepotism is both-siderism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.