There seems to be a key misunderstanding here among us...
If your plan for solidarity ONLY includes those who voted for Hillary you will lose to Trump. Guarantee it. @MikeMalonster
-
-
Not to mention key swing vote involved people who voted for Obama, then Trump. You refuse people who voted O?
@MikeMalonsterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not enough torches in 140ch for all these strawmen, but, does your plan include snubbing those who DID vote HRC?
-
Not in the least. Why would you think that?
-
problem is, we have to WIN first.
-
No. We need to establish some solidarity to prevent people from being killed. That is the urgency.
-
I know it is tiring to hear, but Clinton got nearly 3Mill more votes than Trump. Still lost, but that is not nothing.
-
Which in losing will get people killed.
-
All the more reason to hate dead-ender Berniebros part in making that happen. See how that works?
-
Alright. I can only assume you want fascism bc that is both fact-free and destructive to solidarity.If that's what you want...
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
A real damn good start of "my" plan would be local work to combat voter suppression.
-
Sounds great. For all of us who are in a position to do so that's a great suggestion.
@MikeMalonster - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Because that also ==> lose.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.