1. There is literally no way the IC could know this unless their source is a mole inside Putin's office - which I doubt.https://twitter.com/NBCNightlyNews/status/809182027954024448 …
-
-
ha! I was just thinking the 10 Downing dossier to "fix the facts around the policy"
-
"fix the votes around the idiocracy"
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think the finding it almost exactly like that one: an attempt to launder previously unsourced intel through someone else.
-
Plus, the timing is crazy. Obama, Fri: We're doing intel review. British spooks, Mon: Hey Brennan! Got your 16 words right here!
-
Germany was in between.
-
The attribution for the BND leak?
-
The stuff that came out in between about Russia attempting to influence 2017 German elections.
-
Do you have a link to which you're thinking of?
-
I have to go find it. BRB
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yellowcake was nonsense. Russian interference, however ineffective, was real and coordinated
-
Quite a leap to Putin was directly involved - higher level of allegation, requiring proof that we can't possibly have
@emptywheel
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How is this even a debate when Trump stood in front of an audience and asked Putin to hack the DNC?
-
Did not ask Putin to hack. He asked 4 the emails to be released from the hacked docs. But even if he did, so?
@emptywheel
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Orangecake
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.