You begin w/ a false premise.The gov't did release an official statement attributing the hacks to Russia https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/215-press-releases-2016/1423-joint-dhs-odni-election-security-statement …
Different thread, right? There are 2 Qs. Why WH didn't release pre (but conclusion wasn't there) ...
-
-
And why post-elex statement (THanksgiving weekend) not more alarmed.
-
Why would the post-election statement need to be alarmed? The (probable) fact that Russia hacked HRC doesn't mean DJT didn't...
-
...win legitimately and legally.
-
I mean despite the unfairness and scandalousness of the (probable) Russian intervention, it doesn't invalidate elex results.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There could be any number of reasons that pre-elex statement didn't include CIA conclusion. (1) It's not part of intelligence...
-
...community consensus (the statements explicitly indicated consensus) (2) new evidence, (3) reluctance to appear partisan, etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.