To everyone highlighting this part of the NYT story as a "gotcha": Note that this story was itself based on leaks. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html …pic.twitter.com/CJWuXmbbra
Abundant tweets about civil liberties & national security. "Has a longer memory than an elephant & keeps more records than Jim Comey.” Legendary potty mouth.
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
To everyone highlighting this part of the NYT story as a "gotcha": Note that this story was itself based on leaks. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html …pic.twitter.com/CJWuXmbbra
Much of material in article come from documents and emails "obtained by the Times" from (& interviews with) unnamed sources.
But it is by all appearances a sanctioned story, not least bc it puts best possible spin on Dems.
Sure, but my point is: whether docs came from DNC, FBI, etc., were provided by someone w/an agenda -- just like Guccifer, etc.
So, it's weird to say "NYT furthered Russian agenda" by reporting Guccifer stuff & not "NYT furthered ___ agenda w/this story."
Sources always have their own agenda, even if it's just their concept of the public good (and, IMO, it's usually not that).
But I do think they make it clear these were official Dem sources and so we should understand that's whose agenda it reflects
I suppose, but line critical of NYT reporting Guccifer stuff then implies that leaks are OK only if journos agrees w/agenda.
My reaction was to tweets implying this was a "self-own" by NYT, missing fact that story itself is furthering source's agenda.
Sure. Also, it couldn't have been a self-own given the way they blamed Intercept anyway.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.