Which is my entire point. I really don't get what you are getting at here.
-
-
Replying to @jeremyscahill @TinyRevolution
... How explain claims of knowledge of intent? Why imagine likely evidence or need to keep part secret?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidcnswanson @TinyRevolution
your position seems to be totally naive about Russian intel agencies and espionage in general.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jeremyscahill @TinyRevolution
Are you fantasizing that I suggested Russia wouldn't do it or doesn't spy on anyone or something?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidcnswanson @TinyRevolution
trying to understand what you are saying we are doing wrong. You seem to imply there is 0 chance it's true
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jeremyscahill @TinyRevolution
Not trying to argue or to provoke all these strawmen. Do believe CIA lying until proven honest
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @davidcnswanson
THat's why I think most obvious motive makes most sense: Vlad retaliating for 2011 Russia 1/3
@jeremyscahill@tinyrevolution2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @davidcnswanson
2011 false claims act regime change in Libya, 2012-now covert ops Syria, 2014 Ukraine 1/4
@jeremyscahill@tinyrevolution1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @davidcnswanson
We know Vlad believes all that is US covert ops, personally blamed Hillary for 2011 Russia
@jeremyscahill@tinyrevolution1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @davidcnswanson
But if CIA said, "Vlad retaliating for covert regime change," changes calculus of those ops
@jeremyscahill@tinyrevolution1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
(Noting, I'm NOT saying 2011 RU, 2014 UK are CIA, just that Vlad believes they are) @jeremyscahill @tinyrevolution
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.