This Mike McFaul op-ed--published 2 weeks after WaPo had to correct one of his facts--still has factual errors. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2016/12/10/lets-get-the-facts-right-on-foreign-involvement-in-our-elections/?postshare=3481481415091401&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.f6837c4c37e5 …
What do you mean by "this activity"? In any case, apparently the IC disagrees with you.
-
-
That level of sophisticated hacking. And who, exactly, seems to disagree w that assessment?
-
What hack? Again, people who conflate all these hacks are a big problem as they discredit areas where there's more certainty.
-
I'm referring to the probing/hacking of the voting systems.
-
So you're suggesting DHS lied when it released an alert saying that cybercriminals do that?
-
IC lied when they said they could not attribute? Those are serious accusations.
-
I think it's far more likely that your information is mistaken.
-
That the information in two publicly available assessments misrepresented the belief of those agencies, you mean.
-
Again, this is an explosive charge from you. You're saying formal IC assessments are presenting false claims.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.