I actually find it increasingly amused CIA is not considering the most likely explanation incl Vlad's 2011 complaints. @nailbomb3
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @krypt3ia
Import of 2011 protests for Vlad was AP test question this year, one everyone got wrong. Is bc we can't speak abt it?
@nailbomb31 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @krypt3ia
Right. My point is that CIA is still unwilling to consider "Poot went after Clinton bc of our covert actions"
@nailbomb31 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @krypt3ia
Or maybe they're willing ot consider it but not leak it to the WaPo.
@nailbomb31 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @krypt3ia
Indeed, if US thinks Poot has anything even HINTING of proof of involvement in '11 protests, would explain non-response
@nailbomb31 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @emptywheel @krypt3ia
After all, if US said, "OMIGOD Poot worked against Hillary" and Poot produced evidence we worked against him in 2011... @nailbomb3
5:36 AM - 12 Dec 2016
1 reply
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.