This Mike McFaul op-ed--published 2 weeks after WaPo had to correct one of his facts--still has factual errors. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2016/12/10/lets-get-the-facts-right-on-foreign-involvement-in-our-elections/?postshare=3481481415091401&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.f6837c4c37e5 …
-
-
Humorously, McFaul complains "WL & others published data stolen fr John Podesta" in outlet that published this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/10/28/what-podestas-emails-reveal-about-clintons-ties-to-the-progressive-left/?utm_term=.c2a5e7137974 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any others?
-
That's the big one. I find it interesting, tho, that WaPo let him write an op-ed after they had to correct a quote fr him.
-
In fairness, it's not exactly an unreasonable reach.
-
When ID hackers have a history of stealing voter information? Nope. It's the kind of stupidity that discredits real evidence.
-
Plus, the entire piece is remarkably unaware of WH statement post-election. He's just spouting.
-
How's that?
-
WH statement is one source of "facts." If you want to give facts, maybe exhibit familiarity with it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.