CIA briefed again this week. WaPo's story is somewhat contradictory. Maybe consensus view among IC, maybe some "minor disagreements."
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
ALERT ALERT! Aluminum tubes were a "minor disagreement," relegated to a footnote we all wish Senators (incl most involved here) had read.
3 replies 31 retweets 70 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
So today, White House says, "OK, let's do an all-IC assessment of CIA's theories, shall we?" Hours later, this leak occurs.
5 replies 66 retweets 113 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Effectively, this is CIA (and Dem Senators) trying to pre-empt the WH review. They've given you the answer, who needs more?
4 replies 51 retweets 94 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Trust me! I don't want Trump as President. I'd LOVE if there's good reason to declare him--& Pence!!--unfit. Yeah!! CIA saves US democracy!
4 replies 25 retweets 85 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel
If it is--esp if they'll share assessment! esp if proof it affected election--then by all means let's declare the election null and void.
11 replies 29 retweets 78 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Separate issues. Question isn't so much whether it tipped the election, but specific motivation to throw support behind Trump /2
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @empiricalerror
I'd LOVE if there's a way to legitimately have electors vote against. But...
3 replies 4 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @empiricalerror
If Poot failed in his efforts, bc Comey is a self-righteous ass and bc Hillary doesn't know where WI is on a map, then what?
2 replies 6 retweets 28 likes
Ultimately, if electors want to vote v Trump, by all means they can. I guess I support an elector briefing b4 they vote
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.