So let's review what we know: 1) In September, CIA briefed this, and McConnell (who's unreliable) didn't buy it. https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/12/09/unpacking-new-cia-leak-dont-ignore-aluminum-tube-footnote/ …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
Since then, Harry Reid, then SSCI, then Adam Schiff, then others, called on O to declassify stuff.
1 reply 34 retweets 70 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
On Nov 26, the White House released an irresponsible (bc anon) statement downplaying RU influence. https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/11/28/white-house-attempts-unring-election-integrity-fearmongering/ …
3 replies 30 retweets 57 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
More Dems: release the Kraken, release the Kraken! Finally, McCain, then Lindsey, joined in, by more Republicans.
1 reply 24 retweets 83 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
CIA briefed again this week. WaPo's story is somewhat contradictory. Maybe consensus view among IC, maybe some "minor disagreements."
2 replies 29 retweets 63 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
ALERT ALERT! Aluminum tubes were a "minor disagreement," relegated to a footnote we all wish Senators (incl most involved here) had read.
3 replies 31 retweets 70 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
So today, White House says, "OK, let's do an all-IC assessment of CIA's theories, shall we?" Hours later, this leak occurs.
5 replies 66 retweets 113 likes -
-
Replying to @chrislhayes @emptywheel
does it clarify any intentions or imply caution about any points in wapo? Honest q
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
did you read it? @chrislhayes
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @chrislhayes
I just saw the rest of your thread
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.