Comparing descriptions of what the election review will include suggests no one knows what the review will entail. https://www.emptywheel.net/2016/12/09/game-telephone-election-hacking-review/ …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
For example: Is the review of 2008 and 2012 of non-Russian hacking? Sure seems like it.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
: NYT and WaPo seem to be framing it wrong. It is a comprehensive review, including 08 and 12.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ericgeller
Yes, that's part of why I did the post comparing. Also, CNN thinks all hacking is RU, which WaPo says couldn't be.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @ericgeller
My GUESS is you guys got it right, w/necessary context of 2008 and 2012, but still doesn't say whether leaks included.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
: Indeed. We don't know. WH being cagey, possibly because exact parameters haven't been/can't be set yet.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ericgeller
I don't suppose the WH included NSA/CIA's hacks of
@EPN in 2012 in the review? Or is it just election-related hacking of us?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
In any case, thing they have always been dodgiest about is whether they have proof of how DNC, Podesta leaked to WL.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.