I suspect it will be very difficult to produce an unclassified yet full account of this, but it’s very important. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/us/obama-russia-election-hack.html …
-
-
No, you’re reading an awful lot into my comment.
-
Nah, just joking mostly. It is possible that Sanger's reporting is sloppy AND that classification issues difficult.
-
I have no specific info here, but I can’t imagine attribution here without involving genuinely sensitive sources/methods.
-
Again, not questioning the sensitivity of information it would take to prove attribution. Suggesting Sanger's reporting sloppy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The WH has already issued an OTR statement that seems to conflict with what Sanger has reported. Is that now invalidated?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.