I suspect it will be very difficult to produce an unclassified yet full account of this, but it’s very important. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/us/obama-russia-election-hack.html …
There's some remarkable sloppiness in Sanger's story. Let's hope the report will at least clean that up.
-
-
The intel agencies hold most of the cards here.
-
Are you suggesting Sanger is not playing with a full deck? Because I'm not talking abt classified info.
-
No, you’re reading an awful lot into my comment.
-
Nah, just joking mostly. It is possible that Sanger's reporting is sloppy AND that classification issues difficult.
-
I have no specific info here, but I can’t imagine attribution here without involving genuinely sensitive sources/methods.
-
Again, not questioning the sensitivity of information it would take to prove attribution. Suggesting Sanger's reporting sloppy
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.