So no. It's not specific. You DO know abt the still active 2006 Bradbury opinion on Appendix M, I hope? @mattduss
So you're not adequately prepared to engage in this discussion. Is that your response? @AliWatkins @mattduss
-
-
Perhaps after CAP pays you to prepare adequately you can come back and ask where the loopholes are?
@AliWatkins@mattduss -
Easy friends.
-
Hey, if
@KenGude wants to apologize for suggesting I'm just doing this bc it's "good for business," I'm okay w/that.@AliWatkins -
i do apologize for that. it was wrong.
-
Thank you.
@mattduss@AliWatkins
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.