My take on US v Mohamed, the new 9th Circuit 702 case, and why its 4th Amendment analysis is a little odd. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/12/05/9th-circuit-upholds-warrantless-email-surveillance-of-person-in-the-u-s-communicating-with-foreigners-abroad-when-the-foreigners-are-the-targets/?utm_term=.efaef31a1ccc …
-
-
-
-
there already is an exigent request for TIII in 2518, and an emergency exception for stored email in 2702.
-
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.