This seems dangerous. It's mandating firms take positions on reality. Are they supposed to hire investigative journos?
-
-
-
It's not. It's saying when firms say they're going to be responsive to reports of hate speech, they do so.
-
As it is, firms are making far more substantive judgments abt what counts as terrorist content.
-
There's less ambiguity over what constitutes terroristic content vs hate speech.Less cultural differences w/ terroristic content
-
You think every 3rd teacher in Turkey is a terrorist? Because Erdogan does.
-
Of course I don't. I didn't say there were no cultural differences.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.