Everything I've seen says that the voters who were not persuaded were not persuadable.
I mean I've heard reps fr all big Dem institutions in MI bitching. They don't have local knowledge?
-
-
Of course they do, but they also have other reasons to lobby for attention and resources on their states.
-
All of which take second fiddle to "if you ignore basic shit about my state we'll lose it big." But you want to blame Stein.
-
Let's try this again. That it was close = fragility of democracy. That a close election was lost = campaign.
-
HAHAHAHAHAH. No. That it was close = someone taking most important election in recent history and STILL running arrogantly. Done.
-
That condescending people like you then want to blame democracy rather than competence is anti-democratic. And fragile.
-
This entire convo has been a good example of problem: Don't listen. Talk down to people like they're idiots. That was what lost this
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They do, but there's also hindsight bias, wanting to claim that their path was the best etc. Have to be careful in evaluating.
-
This is the same stuff they have said for every election since 2000. No hindsight needed for anyone who's not an arrogant outsider.
-
Again, you KEEP making anti-democratic comments.
-
It's anti-democratic for a campaign to make judgments about priorities?
-
It's anti-democratic to ignore local people during campaign and then blame local people for losing, like you're doing.
-
Better to just suck it up and say Hillary was arrogant abt 2 states she lost in the primary, which is what happened.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
These are the people who do all the work you lectured me about condescendingly before. They knew. Don't they count?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.