I judge with my judgment. Including judging how I think things should be. What else would I do?
-
-
Replying to @fpgeek
Maybe not be a condescending prick and ask why people find (before the election) Hillary unpersuasive?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Everything I've seen says that the voters who were not persuaded were not persuadable.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fpgeek
I've not seen that, nor have I -- in MI -- experienced that. But that is an easy out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @fpgeek
What I have seen is Hillary chose to run on a message that did not address key issues that these voters cared about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
It was also a message that should have brought in other votes but didn't because of polarization. A dimension of fragility.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fpgeek @emptywheel
And winning on it would have strengthened democratic institutions more. In retrospect, all wrong, but that's in retrospect.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fpgeek
Why would have winning that failed to address the issues of the majority have strengthened democratic institutions? On the contrary!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
A close win on an economic theme would have mainstreamed a lot of the worst of the Trump campaign. A win on fitness doesn't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fpgeek
That is batshit nuts. "An econ theme" is what just blew up the US. And you're STILL dismissing its seriousness as "a theme"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Damn you own far more of this blame than I initially thought. Your condescension goes well beyond tweets, as it turns out.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.