If you're objecting that I have a judgment on quality of the campaign separate from the result, then yes, I'll agree to that.
Or maybe the aforementioned bad polling. No, lots of people here were saying it was a bad message. Not an excuse.
-
-
And lots of people were saying it was good. Vulnerability to wrong message, bad polling underlines fragility.
-
"Lots of people" who weren't the key people in the key states. That is, this is yet another symptom of the problem!
-
All your defenses keep reinforcing the case that Hillary simply ignored the people who knew. That is, anti-democracy.
-
Without hindsight, you don't know who knew. The people she was listening to also talked to voters, just the wrong ones.
-
WTF!!! The people in states Hillary chose to ignore were all screaming that. It took no hindsight. It took local knowledge & respect
-
I mean I've heard reps fr all big Dem institutions in MI bitching. They don't have local knowledge?
-
They do, but there's also hindsight bias, wanting to claim that their path was the best etc. Have to be careful in evaluating.
-
This is the same stuff they have said for every election since 2000. No hindsight needed for anyone who's not an arrogant outsider.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.