Plenty to blame Hillary for (focus on wrong states, wrong voters, unfitness over policy, etc). But that's not the point.
yes. You're exonerating the person who had all the resources here. And the responsibility.
-
-
If you're objecting that I have a judgment on quality of the campaign separate from the result, then yes, I'll agree to that.
-
So your judgement is the campaign that failed was great? OK. That's not democracy. Nope. No wonder you're sad.
-
Not great. Looked like it should have been good enough to me (better than Kerry, Gore, ...).
-
But you weren't one of the voters who wasn't persuaded so not a great judge.
-
I judge with my judgment. Including judging how I think things should be. What else would I do?
-
Maybe not be a condescending prick and ask why people find (before the election) Hillary unpersuasive?
-
Everything I've seen says that the voters who were not persuaded were not persuadable.
-
I've not seen that, nor have I -- in MI -- experienced that. But that is an easy out.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.