Yes, not dependent on Jill Stein not being a vanity candidate. It depends on voters being thoughtful enough to not vote for her.
-
-
Replying to @fpgeek
Go ahead and keep calling Stein a vanity candidate. But the woman who wanted to be CINC couldn't out-persuade her, per you.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Stein is a vanity candidate because she could have done lots of good but making a Green bloc in the MA legislature...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fpgeek @emptywheel
And she chose to be in the papers by running for Governor and (later) President instead.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fpgeek
OMIGOSH. Now we're against Free speech and other things to save democracy!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
That's a willful misinterpretation of what I said.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fpgeek
Oh. Or maybe think more about the implications of what you said. Go ahead. I'm waiting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
The implications of me not voting for candidates I view as more interested in fame than in advancing my policy goals?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fpgeek
No. The implications of you thinking you're doing your democratic duty by bitching abt others' exercising rights than Hillary...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @fpgeek
...actually persuading D-leaning voters. You demand greater-than-voting activity of others but excuse own nothing-but-condescension.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Rather than bitching abt a minor candidate maybe blame yourself for not persuading more voters? Or demanding Hillary do same?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.