No. It is vulnerable to candidates who (under your ethic) have no interest in persuading or (Hillary's) don't effectively.
Oh. Or maybe think more about the implications of what you said. Go ahead. I'm waiting.
-
-
The implications of me not voting for candidates I view as more interested in fame than in advancing my policy goals?
-
No. The implications of you thinking you're doing your democratic duty by bitching abt others' exercising rights than Hillary...
-
I never said this is doing my democratic duty. This is me venting so i have more energy for the boulder later, hopefully.
-
Well, then place responsibility where it lays. With Hillary and her supporters (that is, you). Don't condescend. It's undemocratic.
-
Plenty to blame Hillary for (focus on wrong states, wrong voters, unfitness over policy, etc). But that's not the point.
-
She ran a campaign that executed well on an objectively reasonable and truthful strategy. You can ask for more, but...
-
So her pollsters are responsible for her loss?
-
Lots of responsibility for the loss. Many shared causes. Not the point.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.