that's still 70% of Clinton voters saying their top priority wasn't Trump @emptywheel
-
-
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
So more than the 2.5M margin of popular victory.
@DemFromCT1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @DemFromCT
sure, but your original post was about were more pro-Hillary or anti-Trump Lots and lots of data says former
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
Where do you get that from, "Hillary partisans assume all votes cast for her were *for* her"? All = 100%.
@DemFromCT1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @DemFromCT
yes, "all" is ridiculous. But data shows it's a much larger portion than many thought, & portrayed in media narrative
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel @DemFromCT
there is a lot of polling data on this, consistently for months "for-Hillary" much higher than "against-Trump"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
Again, that's NOT what my arg is! My arg is that a big percent -- 30% -- did not vote *for* Hillary.
@DemFromCT2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @JakeLaperruque
Marcy is certainly right (not sure exact number). Can't deny existence of hold-nose vote.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DemFromCT @emptywheel
yes, I agree on that. And maybe if it was her v Kasich she would have lost pop vote.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Hard to say bc her campaign message might have been far more effective. @DemFromCT
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.