Why is it that Hillary partisans assume all votes cast for her were *for* her and not against Donald, which is what her closing arg was?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
actually some data says it was against donald, more than his were against hers. http://kff.org/health-reform/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-november-2016/ …pic.twitter.com/1A5f7LDTY4
3 replies 6 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @DemFromCT
that's still 70% of Clinton voters saying their top priority wasn't Trump
@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
So more than the 2.5M margin of popular victory.
@DemFromCT1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @DemFromCT
sure, but your original post was about were more pro-Hillary or anti-Trump Lots and lots of data says former
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
Where do you get that from, "Hillary partisans assume all votes cast for her were *for* her"? All = 100%.
@DemFromCT1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @DemFromCT
yes, "all" is ridiculous. But data shows it's a much larger portion than many thought, & portrayed in media narrative
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel @JakeLaperruque
And why would that be invalid anyway given that her (totally ineffective) closing arg was "Trump is a dick"?
@DemFromCT1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @JakeLaperruque
wasn't totally ineffective. Numbers suggest people heard and responded. But Comey had a better closer.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
As did Trump's. His closing ad was superb. @JakeLaperruque
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.