.@SenatorLankford pushes back on Trump's unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud, via @eschorhttp://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/trump-voter-fraud-james-lankford-231878 …
Actually, no. They cited RU to explain why they did so much work studying whether evidence of hack, which they didn't find.
-
-
I feel like this is splitting hairs. It was cited in the press release announcing their participation.
-
Which you're reading out of context to claim equivalency w/Trump's own-voice unsubstantiated claims.
-
The context is a vote recount, predicated on zero evidence of any fraud or interference.
-
Sure. That was Stein's choice. Happens w/ or w/o Hillary.
-
Right. So Hillary jumping in speaks for itself.
-
Again, Trump's people are also participating (and have left open option to object to MI one).
-
Again, Hillary's press release cited these concerns as part of rationale for joining. I don't see a distinction here.
-
Here's their SOLE justification: "We intend to participate in order to ensure process proceeds in a manner fair to all sides."
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.