.@SenatorLankford pushes back on Trump's unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud, via @eschorhttp://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/trump-voter-fraud-james-lankford-231878 …
-
-
Then why cite that when rationalizing their participation?
-
They're not making their own claims, they're citing IC (and shitty WaPo piece).
-
Right, and they're using those claims to support their participation. Can't have it both ways.
-
Actually, no. They cited RU to explain why they did so much work studying whether evidence of hack, which they didn't find.
-
I feel like this is splitting hairs. It was cited in the press release announcing their participation.
-
Which you're reading out of context to claim equivalency w/Trump's own-voice unsubstantiated claims.
-
The context is a vote recount, predicated on zero evidence of any fraud or interference.
-
Sure. That was Stein's choice. Happens w/ or w/o Hillary.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.