.@SenatorLankford pushes back on Trump's unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud, via @eschorhttp://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/trump-voter-fraud-james-lankford-231878 …
Do you have a link to where Hillary made unsubstantiated claims? Or even Stein? @seungminkim @SenatorLankford @eschor
-
-
http://www.jill2016.com/fec Hopefully judge will require her to produce evidence to support.
-
I don't think that's the link you wanted.
-
I think they should substantiate claims of Russian interference and hacking. Otherwise, why bother with a recount?
-
But their claims that RU hacked DNC are not tied to recount claims.
-
Then why cite that when rationalizing their participation?
-
They're not making their own claims, they're citing IC (and shitty WaPo piece).
-
Right, and they're using those claims to support their participation. Can't have it both ways.
-
Actually, no. They cited RU to explain why they did so much work studying whether evidence of hack, which they didn't find.
- 16 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Team Hillary cited "Russian hacking" in the medium post. Would love to see evidence
-
But pointedly NOT in conjunction w/recount they didn't ask for.
-
They said "we had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology, "
-
Exactly. But then they point at Russian "interference". So either put up or shut up. Just like Trump.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I take it Sen. Lankford thinks the recount is a waste of time, money, & political capital
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.