Comey really did elect Trump. Here's the data that shows it.http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/11/11/1596764/-Comey-really-did-elect-Trump-Here-s-the-data-that-shows-it …
How does a surge that starts before the Comey letter prove the letter caused the surge?
-
-
not sure if you read whole blog post or links but I think that is made clear.
-
It doesn't at all. That post in no way proves that it was Comey. It may be, but the DATA in that post show it wasn't.
-
like I said, data isn't definitive but strongly suggests the letter had an impact. Change the election? I wouldn't go that far
-
then you might end up falling short of the truth.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"people who decided one week before the election, i.e., just after Comey pulled his dirty trick, broke hard for Trump"
-
Correlation does not equal causation, ESPECIALLY when you have countervailing data.
-
I think you're putting words in my mouth here. Not helpful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
doesn't seem definitive to me but highly likely based on the data
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that said, I think it's still an excuse for Clinton camp and Dem party failures
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.