Your "reasoning" is that you're inconsistent. That's okay. Embrace it! But don't pretend you're smarter than that NPR woman.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
no idea whether I'm "smarter" than her. I disagree with her assumptions, as I do with yours. No need for ad hominem.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xan_desanctis
Where's the ad hom? I'm simply suggesting you're no better than that woman, which you implied you are. That's ad hom?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @xan_desanctis
Also, what ARE my assumptions, pray tell?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
don't think I'm better than her, again, just disagree with her/your assumption that BC should be covered.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xan_desanctis
Whoops. You're now assuming my assumptions. Please don't. I stated what the law currently is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @xan_desanctis
The only "assumption" I made is that all reproductive health should be treated the same--pregnancy or not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @xan_desanctis
I would also say IF we're going to leave choices to insurers, we should make sure there is actually competition. There's not.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I disagree that all "reproductive health" is the same, but couldn't agree more that we need competition.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xan_desanctis
Yes, again, you are admitting your own biases. I hope you never have medical complications make you revisit them the hard way
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Also, not saying we need to provide health insurance thru market, just that it is idiotic to do so w/o functioning market.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.