Or maybe she was using shorthand and you're now using it to make a comment that suggests ignorance of insurance. 2 errors.
That is your opinion, to which you're entitled. But your comment on that woman made errors of fact.
-
-
When insurance won't provide BC, govt pays for it. Expectation is that govt will compel insurance companies or cover BC itself.
-
Yes. Bc the law is that insurers not refuse paying for normal women's health care, including pregnancy and birth control.
-
that's what I'm saying: it shouldn't be the law. The law stems from the incorrect assumption that BC is necessary medical care
-
Just like assumption pregnancy is necessary medical care. It's not!
-
And by the way, for 6 years of my life, birth control was necessary healthcare for me. You seem ignorant abt women's health.
-
what I'm saying is simple: Leave govt out of it. BC is necessary rarely if ever. But regardless, let providers decide
-
Fine. I get your opinion. But please be consistent and apply same standard to pre-natal care and delivery then.
-
don't believe delivery care and birth control fall under same standard. But yes, companies should be free to decide.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
nothing I said was false
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.