Plus, they're leaking lie a sieve. But that's actually pretty normal. What's not normal is the subject of those leaks.
-
-
-
Important to distinguish "trying to get Trump elected" fr "believe there's a crime w/o evidence" bc latter can affect other subjects.
-
How many non-famous people are they making such assumptions about--again, w/o evidence--every day?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
interesting that you're somehow aware of what they've seen/looked at. Please share!
-
I'm not. I have, however, read multiple stories that PIN doesn't think they have evidence.
-
"reading multiple stories" is good enough for a declarative statement like that? Respect you greatly, but that's sub-standard.
-
Fair enough. But no less evidence there 1) that they are affirmatively trying to elect Trump or 2) that there is evidence.
-
Ignorance of the facts of the investigation does not equate to lack of evidence. You MAY be right. We'll see.
-
& it may be by obtaining email server emails via source w/o immunity tie they'll be able to sustain CF investigation a year
-
True. BTW, I'm a HUGE fan of yours. Years now. That's why I hold you to the highest standard in your phraseology.
-
I actually really appreciate that. Thank you. (And thanks for kind comment.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are two sides to that claim. One reason why so many immunity agreements is bc Hillary, not aides, target.
-
Not inconceivable they could have gotten Mills for obstruction. BUt instead went after Hillary for classified emails.
-
Plea deals are another way to get cooperation. They could've done both.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
W/o complete evidence because DoJ refused to convene grand jury, approve subpoenas, thereby obstructing investigation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Looks like Pinchuk was laundering illegal Iranian money through the CF. http://www.newsweek.com/2015/04/24/hillary-clinton-runs-white-house-and-row-over-ukrainian-benefactors-trade-322253.html … Nuland https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dexrP27MMdU …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
FBI probably thinks it's suspicious that Clinton intervened in UBS invetigation then got millions. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.